DIYfor change
EN
Amy Acton speaks into a microphone at a conference in 2025

Ohio, USA · 2026

Amy Acton in Ohio

In 2026, Dr. Amy Acton beat Vivek Ramaswamy to become Ohio's governor. She built hundreds of thousands of small donations and answered the race's worst attack within hours.

Updated 4 November 202629 min readSources (23)

A tribute to Amy Acton, to Philip Stearns, who spoke in public about the childhood they shared, and to the hundreds of thousands of people who gave. An independent project with no link to the campaign.

Overview

In 30 seconds

  1. $25 average gift. By June 2026, the campaign says it had received more than 326,000 donations, over 95% of them $100 or less.

  2. The opponent, Vivek Ramaswamy, put in $25 million of his own money. From January to April 2026, Acton raised twice as much as he did from Ohio donors.

  3. On 20 October, as a video featuring the mother Acton is estranged from spread, she spoke on TV and her brother recorded a statement.

  4. Even Republican Governor Mike DeWine condemned the attack. Acton won on 3 November; the response's effect on votes has not been measured.

First steps

  1. Poll how voters remember the candidate's earlier role
  2. Gather and check the public records of her personal story
  3. Open a legal donation page with low suggested amounts

Try it now Adapt it with the assistant

If you're new to this, start with the fundamentals, from the vote goal to what the research says. Read the fundamentals

Context and story

The story

In 2020, Amy Acton was the doctor at the 2 p.m.

In 2020, Amy Acton was the doctor at the 2 p.m. briefings, the health director a Republican governor let speak first. Six years later she ran for governor of Ohio against a Trump-backed billionaire. She won after building a base of small donors she reported every quarter and after giving a fast response, voiced by her family, to the most personal attack of the election.

326,000+
donations by June 2026, averaging $25, more than 95% at $100 or lesscampaign figure Source
$3.88M
from Ohio donors from January to 15 April 2026, twice Ramaswamy's $1.94Mofficial Source
73,000
members of the Dr. Amy Acton Fan Club on Facebook on 27 March 2020platform figure Source
$4M
that Ramaswamy's campaign announced to run the video featuring Acton's mothercampaign figure Source

From the briefings to the governor's office

  1. Mar. 2020Director of the Department of Health since February 2019 (the first woman in the post), Acton appears every day at 2 p.m. beside DeWine. Her Facebook fan club reaches 73,000 members.
  2. May–Jun. 2020Protesters, some of them armed, gather outside her home. On 11 June, Acton resigns after Republican lawmakers introduce bills she believed would force her to violate her medical oath.
  3. 7 Jan. 2025Launches her run for governor as a Democrat.
  4. 2025Ends the year with $5.3 million, a record in Ohio for a non-incumbent Democratic candidate for governor, with an average grassroots gift of $28 and about 70% of donations from the state (campaign figures).
  5. Jan.–Apr. 2026David Pepper joins as running mate. In the first quarter, the campaign says it received 76,000 donations and more than $4.8 million.
  6. May–Jul. 2026Acton runs unopposed in the primary; Ramaswamy wins his. On 9 July, the campaign announces $9.4 million in the second quarter and $18.4 million in total.
  7. Sep. 2026The campaign turns down debates on CNN and WLWT, citing personal attacks in the opponent's ads. On 6 September, an armed man lunges at Acton at the Canfield Fair; volunteers suffer minor injuries.
  8. 19–20 Oct.An unsigned video of Acton's birth mother calling her a liar appears on a blog on Monday night and spreads. On Tuesday, Acton answers on TV while it is still unattributed, and her brother issues a statement and records a video; Ramaswamy confirms the ad is his campaign's, and the campaign says it will spend $4 million to promote it.
  9. 21–22 Oct.MK Pritzker, first lady of Illinois, gives Acton $500,000. Governor DeWine, who backed Ramaswamy, asks for the ad to come down; former governor John Kasich also calls for it to be pulled.
  10. 3 Nov.Acton wins, according to AP. The official count is not yet final.

Three layers

Little is known yet about the org chart. What is documented falls into three parts.

  • The ticket and headquartersThe candidate as the main messenger, campaign manager Philip Stein putting his name to the numbers, and David Pepper, a former party chair with his own newsletter, on the ticket as running mate.
  • The donor baseHundreds of thousands of small gifts through ActBlue, from all 88 Ohio counties, with a growing share from out of state as the race drew national attention.
  • Allies and outside voicesUnions such as the Ohio AFL-CIO, SEIU, UAW and the teachers' union (OEA) backed Acton; the Democratic Governors Association invested in the state. After the attack, well-known Republicans condemned it on their own.
What isn't known. Almost all the donation figures come from campaign releases; the 2026 figures by state come from the official filings read by NBC4.

The campaign's own figures do not always line up: it reported more than $5.3 million for 2025, then said the $4.8 million of the first quarter of 2026 topped all of 2025. Ohio's share is measured in different ways (in dollars or in number of donations) and fell from about 75% to just over half during 2026. On the opponent's money: the $25 million is structured as a loan he can repay himself from donations (Ohio Capital Journal); NBC4 places it in the January to April 2026 filing period, while Signal Ohio describes it as a loan from 2025. No vote share is given here because the official count is not yet final. It is not known who designed the 20 October response, whether it brought in donations (the only one known is MK Pritzker's) or whether it moved votes: the polls quoted all predate the video. A 30 October headline indicates the ad went off the air, but the article could not be read, so how much of the $4 million was spent is unknown. What is said here about Acton's childhood comes from her own account and from the 1978 police and court records obtained by AP; her stepfather pleaded not guilty, and the case stalled when he fled. What her mother says in the ad is her own claim.

The rest of the win

This playbook looks at the money, the trust and the response to the attack.

This playbook looks at the money, the trust and the response to the attack. The election was on 3 November 2026 and, a day later, there is still no account from the people who ran the campaign and no analysis of the vote. This section will be revised as they publish their accounts.

  • A national waveDemocrats won governorships in several states Republicans had controlled for years, Ohio, Texas and Iowa among them. Acton's win was part of that wave, and how much of it is down to her campaign is unknown. AP via PBS NewsHour, 4 Nov. 2026
  • Outside moneyThe Democratic Governors Association spent more in Ohio than the $1 million it gave Texas's candidate, according to AP. The exact figure has not been disclosed. AP via PBS NewsHour, 4 Nov. 2026
  • Unions and national endorsementsActon was backed by the Ohio AFL-CIO, SEIU, UAW and the teachers' union, as well as Barack Obama and Sherrod Brown. How much field work these allies did is not documented. Wikipedia, revision of 16 Oct. 2026
  • A divided Republican sideTrump defended the ad and JD Vance criticized Republicans who complained; DeWine, Kasich, Husted and Frank LaRose distanced themselves from it. Ohio's party chair warned he was “keeping score.” Cleveland 19, 22 Oct. 2026
  • What is still unknownThe official margin, turnout, how many volunteers and doors the campaign had, who designed the 20 October response and whether it brought in donations. This playbook will be updated once there is an official result and accounts from the people who ran the campaign. AP via PBS NewsHour, 4 Nov. 2026

The terrain

What was specific to Ohio in 2026 and may be missing elsewhere.

What was specific to Ohio in 2026 and may be missing elsewhere.

Platforms

ActBlue
The Democrats' donation platform. The “Chip in $10” buttons on the Substack and the website led straight there, with low suggested amounts.
Substack
The candidate had her own newsletter to announce records, and her running mate, David Pepper, wrote Pepperspectives with requests to give and to share.
Local TV and national news
Acton answered the attack in an interview with Spectrum News, the local cable channel. AP, ABC News and Newsweek took the story national within a day.
Political blogs and X
The video with her mother first appeared, unsigned, in a post by blogger D.J. Byrnes (“The Rooster”) and spread through shares by Donald Trump Jr. and Laura Loomer.
Facebook (2020)
During the pandemic, the Dr. Amy Acton Fan Club group went from 61,000 to 73,000 members in a day in March 2020. That is where the trust the campaign inherited comes from.
TV and streaming ads
Where the opponent spent heavily: Ramaswamy's campaign announced $4 million to put the video with the mother on TV and online.

Local conditions

  • Ohio voted for Trump three times, and Republicans had controlled state government for years. It was an open seat: DeWine, who backed Ramaswamy, was not on the ballot.
  • The opponent lent his campaign $25 million of his own money (Ohio Capital Journal); in June 2026 he had $26.8 million on hand against Acton's $8.1 million (Signal Ohio).
  • In the US, every political ad on TV has to say who paid for it (“paid for by”). The video with the mother circulated without that line, which made authorship the first question.
  • Early voting: when the attack appeared, more than 676,000 Ohioans had already voted, according to AP.
  • The national network of conservative influencers and outlets amplifies any content against a Democratic candidate within hours; several promoted the video with the mother.
  • Acton carried the mark of the pandemic: admired by many, the target of armed protests outside her home in 2020 and of attacks on her Covid record in 2025 and 2026.
  • Most polls before the attack gave Acton the lead, though not all: Marist (15–18 Oct.) had her ahead 50% to 43%, while co/efficient (5–6 Oct.) had Ramaswamy ahead 45% to 43% (Newsweek).

Method and evidence

The method

Seen from outside, the method combines three things: money from many people, reported as proof of support; a candidate with trust built up…

Seen from outside, the method combines three things: money from many people, reported as proof of support; a candidate with trust built up before the race; and a response to personal attacks that put family and records up front.

Three fronts

Small donations as public proof
Low, repeated asks, and an announcement at every filing deadline with four numbers: total, number of donations, average and share from Ohio. Against a self-funding billionaire, the contrast became the message.
The trust of someone who cared for people
Acton came to the race as the doctor from the pandemic briefings who had worked alongside a Republican governor. The team treated her Covid record as an asset, not a weak spot.
A same-day response, with family
When the video with her mother appeared, the candidate spoke once, briefly, and her brother told the story with a standing no staffer could have. The court records the press found did the rest.

The campaign cycle

The first four steps are documented across 2025 and 2026; the last four describe 20 October.

  1. Ask small $10 buttons on the Substack and the website, linked to ActBlue. A low amount lets in people who have never given.
  2. Add up and publish At each quarterly deadline, a release with total, number of donations, average and Ohio share, repeated in the candidate's newsletter and her running mate's.
  3. Contrast Put the numbers next to the opponent's: Ohio donors against millions out of his own pocket.
  4. Ask again Every record becomes a new ask to give and to share, with the billionaire opponent as the reason.
  5. Speak before confirmation On 20 October, Acton condemned the video on TV before the opposing campaign claimed it. One line, without repeating the accusations.
  6. Put up the right witness Her brother issued a written statement and, the same day, a video. He was there; the candidate did not have to defend herself alone.
  7. Let the facts speak AP found the 1978 records on the stepfather. Whether the campaign pointed reporters to them is unknown; what is known is that coverage turned to the records, not the accusations.
  8. Don't feed the attack There is no record of a counter-ad about the mother. Condemnation came from third parties, including Republicans such as DeWine, Kasich and a former primary rival.

And again.

Who did it

This playbook draws on what the campaign itself wrote and said: its fundraising releases, the candidate's Substack newsletter, the…

This playbook draws on what the campaign itself wrote and said: its fundraising releases, the candidate's Substack newsletter, the newsletter of her running mate, David Pepper, and the statements of 20 October. One day after the election, nobody who ran the campaign has published an account yet.

  • Amy Acton

    Democratic candidate for governor; physician, director of the Ohio Department of Health in 2019 and 2020

    Was the face of Ohio's daily pandemic briefings, left the post in June 2020 and used Substack to announce each fundraising record.

    Sources
  • Philip Stein

    Campaign manager

    Signed the quarterly releases that turned every filing deadline into a show of strength against the billionaire opponent.

    Sources
  • David Pepper

    Running mate for lieutenant governor since January 2026; former chair of the Ohio Democratic Party (2015–2020)

    Writes the Pepperspectives newsletter, which relayed the fundraising numbers, asked for donations and shares, and argued the campaign's reading of the polls.

    Sources
  • Philip Stearns

    Amy Acton's brother

    On the day the video with their mother spread, he issued a written statement and recorded a video for the campaign about what the two of them lived through as children.

    Sources

In their own words

Participants' statementsWhat the candidate, her family and her team said about the decisions they made.

What the candidate, her family and her team said about the decisions they made. Paraphrased unless otherwise noted.

3 more quotes
  • He said the record second-quarter haul showed voters across the state ready to elect Acton, against an out-of-touch billionaire opponent.

    Philip Stein, campaign manager, Campaign release, 9 Jul. 2026

  • Announcing the $5.3 million raised in 2025, he reminded readers the campaign was up against a billionaire who was also raising a lot, and asked them to give and spread the word.

    David Pepper, running mate, Pepperspectives (Substack), 30 Jan. 2026

  • He argued that attacking Acton over the pandemic would do little: the issue was old, voters had respected her leadership and she had worked alongside the Republican governor.

    David Pepper, before joining the ticket, Pepperspectives (Substack), 15 Dec. 2025

Materials and exercises

Moves to take with you

Pick the moves that fit your context and add them to your kit.

Pick the moves that fit your context and add them to your kit.

  1. Small donations, published at every deadline

    Low, repeated asks and a release at every filing deadline with total, number of donations, average and in-state share. Acton's campaign says it passed 326,000 donations averaging $25, against an opponent who put in $25 million of his own money.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    It works when the opponent has far more money or relies on a few big donors, and the candidate has a base that wants to help.
    Don't use when
    It doesn't work where small online donations are banned or hard to report, and it doesn't replace TV money when the race is decided by ads.
    1. Week −60 Open a legal donation page with low suggested amounts
    2. Week −58 Put the donate button in the newsletter, on the website and in every video
    3. Week −56 Choose the four numbers that go into every release
    4. Week −48 Publish the numbers at every legal deadline, with the contrast to the opponent
    5. Week −47 Turn every record into a new ask to give and to share
    6. Week −20 Invite donors to give time too: a shift, an event

    Team

    • Digital fundraising: asks, goals and deadlines
    • Compliance: checks every donation against the law
    • Campaign management: signs off the numbers and the contrast

    What to measure: Number of distinct donors per month, and how many of them gave a second time or signed up for a shift.

    Risks to watch: Too many asks wear out the list and inflated numbers destroy credibility: publish only what is in the official filings, let people unsubscribe in one click and never accept a prohibited donation.

  2. Answer a personal attack the same day

    When a personal attack lands, the candidate speaks once, briefly, without repeating the accusation, and the campaign publishes the word of someone with standing the same day. On 20 October, Acton spoke on TV before the opponent claimed the video, and her brother recorded a statement.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    It works when the attack is personal and can be shown to be false or cruel, and there are witnesses and documents.
    Don't use when
    It doesn't work with true and relevant accusations, which call for an explanation rather than outrage, or when the response only spreads a video nobody had seen.
    1. Week −12 List the predictable personal attacks and who can answer each one
    2. Week −10 Gather and check public records on the candidate's story
    3. Week −8 Write and clear with a lawyer a short response to each attack
    4. Week −6 Set up a watch rota for the blogs and accounts that launch attacks
    5. Week −2 On the day, publish the candidate's line and the testimony within hours
    6. Week −2 Log who amplified, who condemned and what happened to donations

    Team

    • Response rota: watches, confirms authorship and calls in the team
    • Candidate: one interview, one line
    • Witness: speaks with consent and support

    What to measure: Hours between the attack appearing and the response going out, and volunteers or donors who signed up in the following 48 hours.

    Risks to watch: Answering everything amplifies the opponent and answering in anger looks like confirmation: choose what deserves a reply, speak once and don't attack family members or the person in the ad.

  3. The voice of someone who was there, with care

    Someone who lived the story speaks instead of the candidate, in writing and on video, with consent and preparation. Philip Stearns said his sister took the worst of the abuse to protect him and accused Ramaswamy of trying to turn her abuse into a political talking point.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    It works when the attack targets the candidate's private life and someone close to her wants to speak.
    Don't use when
    It doesn't work if the witness is pressured, cannot handle the exposure, or the testimony turns into a spectacle.
    1. Week −12 Ask in advance, privately, who would be willing to speak and on what terms
    2. Week −10 Agree what the person does and doesn't want to say, and their right to withdraw
    3. Week −8 Prepare the person for the media and for the attacks that will follow
    4. Week −2 Record the testimony simply, with no music or dramatic editing
    5. Week −1 Call the person in the following days and offer support

    Team

    • Someone the candidate trusts: makes the invitation and stays close
    • Production: records simply and respectfully
    • Support: counselling on hand

    What to measure: Witnesses who agreed with written consent and got a follow-up call after speaking; the goal is to look after every one of them.

    Risks to watch: Exposing a survivor of abuse can hurt them again: only with informed consent, with no details they don't want to give, with support afterwards and no pressure.

  4. Use the trust built outside politics

    Put forward the record that earned the candidate trust before the campaign, and prepare its defence. Acton was the doctor from the pandemic briefings, with a 73,000-strong fan club in 2020; her running mate, David Pepper, defended that record by pointing out she had worked alongside a Republican governor.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    It works when the candidate has a prior public role that voters remember with respect.
    Don't use when
    It doesn't work if the people who decide the election see that record very negatively, or if the campaign pretends it has no weak spots.
    1. Week −40 Poll how voters remember the candidate's earlier role
    2. Week −36 Collect evidence of joint work with people from the other side
    3. Week −30 Prepare answers to the predictable attacks on that record
    4. Week −8 Hold events with professionals from the candidate's field
    5. Week −3 Ask people who remember that work to tell their friends about it

    Team

    • Polling: measures how the record is remembered
    • Evidence: gathers documents and statements from the time
    • Events: brings professionals from the field together with the candidate

    What to measure: Professionals from the candidate's field who signed up to talk to voters or attend an event.

    Risks to watch: The same record mobilizes those who hate it; in 2020, Acton faced armed protests outside her home: plan for security and don't hide the weak spots.

Toolkit

What Acton's campaign left in plain view, organized for you to copy.

What Acton's campaign left in plain view, organized for you to copy. It fits a race against a far richer opponent or any campaign that needs to be ready for a personal attack.

Choose your country to see the equivalent tools and the legal points to check.

Operations

The people who built the internal structure have not described it yet. The roles below mix what is documented with the minimum an attack like the one on 20 October calls for; suggestions are marked.

Minimum team

Candidate as messenger
Speaks in public at the right moment, and briefly. On 20 October, one interview with local TV was enough.
Campaign management
Puts a name to the fundraising numbers and the contrast with the opponent. Here, Philip Stein.
Running mate with a newsletter
A second voice with its own audience, relaying records and asking for money. Here, David Pepper and Pepperspectives.
Digital fundraising
Builds the low-dollar asks, tracks filing deadlines and prepares the numbers for each release. Who did this on the campaign has not been disclosed.
Rapid response (suggestion)
One person on call who watches the blogs and accounts that usually launch attacks, confirms authorship, brings in the candidate and witnesses and has texts ready. Who did this in Ohio has not been disclosed.
Care for the family (suggestion)
Anyone speaking for a survivor of abuse needs consent, preparation and someone to look after them afterwards. How the campaign handled this with Philip Stearns is unknown.

Rhythm

  1. Every quarterly deadlineA fundraising release with the four numbers, posted on the website and Substack and picked up by local press (April, July and January are documented).
  2. End of monthAsks with a monthly goal; in June 2026, the campaign says it raised $3.6 million.
  3. Hour zero of the attackThe video appeared on a blog on Monday night (19 Oct.) and spread through national accounts.
  4. Same dayThe candidate's interview, given while the video was still unattributed, and her brother's written statement; his video came out later that Tuesday. Ramaswamy confirmed the ad was his campaign's the same day.
  5. Following daysOther voices spoke: a $500,000 gift from MK Pritzker on Wednesday and DeWine's condemnation on Thursday.

There is no record of how the campaign made its decisions on 20 October or how long each step took. Suggestion: rehearse your response to a personal attack before the final stretch, with the family member or witness, if they want to take part.

Plan B

  • Two newsletters (the candidate's and the running mate's) so you don't depend on one voice or one list.
  • A short, pre-approved response for the predictable attacks, checked by a lawyer.
  • Witnesses with standing identified in advance, who have agreed to speak if needed and can withdraw.
  • Public documents on the candidate's personal history gathered and checked before anyone uses them against her.
  • Security for the candidate and volunteers at public events, after the Canfield incident.

Technology

Ordinary tools. What counted was publishing the same numbers across several channels and having the response ready to go out within hours.

  • ActBlueFee per donation

    Donation page with low suggested amounts and “give $10” buttons across the Substack and the website.

  • Candidate's newsletter (Substack)Free

    Record announcements, with subscribe, share and donate buttons and room for comments.

  • Running mate's newsletter (Pepperspectives)Free

    Poll readings, fundraising records and asks for money for an already engaged audience, with a paid-for line.

  • Campaign websiteLow cost

    Official releases with each quarter's numbers and donation links. Suggestion: tie every donation ask to a volunteer sign-up.

  • Short testimony videoFree

    Philip Stearns' video, recorded and posted on the day of the attack.

  • Blog and social monitoring (suggestion)Free to low cost

    Alerts on the candidate's name and lists of the accounts that usually launch attacks, so you see a video before it reaches TV.

  • Attack log (suggestion)Free

    A spreadsheet with each attack, who launched it, who amplified it and what the campaign did, so the next decision rests on data.

  • TV adsNot disclosed

    Ramaswamy's campaign announced $4 million for the video with the mother alone; Acton's TV spending does not appear in the sources consulted. Every spot needs a paid-for line.

Channel cheat sheets

Attack log columns

Date and time it appeared · Where it appeared (blog, account, group) · Does it say who paid? · Who amplified it in the first hours · Who confirmed authorship, and when · Response published (time and channel) · Witness or document used · Who condemned it outside the campaign · Donations in the following 48 hours

The campaign has not disclosed how it spent its money. What is known: by June 2026 it had raised $18.4 million and had nearly $10 million on hand, by its own account; fundraising and newsletter tools are cheap, and the biggest cost in a race like this is TV. On the other side, the candidate lent his own campaign $25 million.

Communication

Two different registers: dry, repeated numbers for fundraising, and a short, human response to the personal attack. The formula below sums up 20 October; steps marked as suggestions are not documented.

The formula for answering a personal attack

  1. Don't repeat the attack Name what happened without reproducing the accusations. Acton talked about normalizing an attack on her childhood, not about what the video said.
  2. Speak once, briefly One interview, one quotable line. No long press conference, no defensiveness.
  3. Put forward someone with standing Someone who lived the story and wants to speak. Her brother said what the candidate could not say about herself.
  4. Records before adjectives Verifiable public documents. Here, AP found the 1978 police and court records.
  5. Name the pattern Link the attack to the opponent's repeated behaviour. Acton cited his personal attacks in 2024.
  6. Return to the agenda (suggestion) After the day of the response, get back to the campaign's theme. There is no record of how Acton's campaign did this.

Message rules

  • In every fundraising release, the same four numbers: total, donations, average and in-state share.
  • Always a concrete contrast: who gives and from where, against someone paying out of his own pocket.
  • A low, easy ask: one small suggested amount, one click.
  • Faced with a personal attack, one line from the candidate and the word of someone who was there. Don't repeat the accusation.
  • No family member speaks unless they want to, are prepared and can change their mind.
  • Don't answer by attacking the opponent's family or the person who appears in his ad.

Sample statement

Today an unsigned video went around that uses my family against me. I won't repeat what it says, and I won't treat this as normal. The person who was there is my brother, and he has chosen to speak. The records from that time are public. Tomorrow I'll get back to what matters to the people who live here: the cost of living, health care, our schools.

Take it to your context

What works anywhere and what depended on Ohio in 2026.

What works anywhere and what depended on Ohio in 2026.

Works anywhere

  • Ask for small amounts, often, and publish the number of donations and the average, not just the total.
  • Show where the money comes from: the share from your own state or region is an argument.
  • Against a self-funding opponent, turn the gap into a message.
  • Before the final stretch, list the predictable personal attacks and who can answer each one.
  • Answer the same day, once, without repeating the accusation.
  • Let people with standing speak, with consent and care.
  • Gather and check the public records of your own story before someone else does.
  • Use the trust the candidate built outside politics, and prepare its defence.

Depends on context

ActBlue
Use the legal donation tool in your country (in Brazil, the crowdfunding authorized by the electoral court; in Portugal, the rules of the political finance regulator). Check limits, who may give and how each gift is reported.
Substack
Any newsletter or broadcast channel works: a WhatsApp or Telegram channel, an email list. What matters is a list of your own that does not depend on an algorithm.
The “paid for by” line
Where the law requires ads to say who paid, unsigned content becomes a question of authorship; where it doesn't, ask publicly who is behind it and document who posted it first.
Early voting
Where people vote on a single day, the window to respond is shorter and the response has to go out within hours; where there is early voting, every day of delay is votes lost.
The pandemic doctor
Trust can come from somewhere else: a teacher, a nurse, a community leader. Polling tells you whom the public trusts; the campaign prepares the defence of that record.
A Republican governor who condemns
There won't always be opponents who break with their own side. Without them, witnesses and documents have to carry the response alone.

Practice

ExerciseRehearse with the case's missions and situations.

Decide as the campaign leadership

Five moments from the 2026 campaign. Choose what you would do and see what happened.

5-phase plan

The Acton campaign's sequence, from a year and a half out to election day, as a checklist.

The Acton campaign's sequence, from a year and a half out to election day, as a checklist. It includes suggestions where the case is not documented. Your progress is saved in this browser.

  1. Before the launch

  2. Year one: build the base

  3. Election year: primary and summer

  4. Final stretch: early voting and defence

  5. Election day and after

Check yourself

ExerciseFive questions, each explained after you answer.

Five questions, each explained after you answer.

1. What average gift did the Acton campaign announce in July 2026?
2. Where did the video featuring Acton's mother first appear?
3. Who spoke for the family's story on the day of the attack?
4. What did NBC4 find in the official filings for January to April 2026?
5. What is known about the effect of the response on votes?

Limits and sources

Rules

The rules below protect the campaign's credibility and the people involved.

The rules below protect the campaign's credibility and the people involved.

Say who pays
In the US, political ads on TV must carry a “paid for by” line. The video with the mother appeared without one. Where the law requires disclosure, comply on every piece; where it doesn't, disclose anyway.
Clean donations
Check each donor's eligibility, respect the limits and publish only numbers that match the official filings.
Consent from whoever speaks
Family members and survivors speak only if they want to, prepared, with the right to withdraw and with support afterwards.
Don't expose what isn't yours
The details of abuse belong to the person who suffered it. Use only what they agree to make public and what is already in public records.
Don't attack the opponent's family
In the sources consulted, the Acton campaign's response did not involve Ramaswamy's family or attack the mother who appeared in the video.
Real people only
No fake accounts to spread the response, no undisclosed paid influencers, no coordinated mass reporting of the opponent's content.
Security
In 2020, armed protesters went to Acton's home; in 2026, a man lunged at her at a fair and volunteers were hurt. Plan security for events and for the family.
Local law
Rules on donations, advertising and deadlines vary from country to country. Check with a lawyer before you start.

Limits

What this method doesn't do, and when it fails.
The numbers are the campaign's
Donations, averages and percentages come mostly from the campaign's own releases. Official filings confirm part of them, but nobody outside has audited the total.
There is no proof of effect
The polls quoted predate the attack. No data shows that the 20 October response moved votes, or that small donations decided the election.
It depends on the opponent's mistake
The backlash was strong partly because the attack was seen as cruel, including by Republicans. A subtler attack may not draw the same condemnation.
Small donations don't pay for everything
Even with records, Acton had less cash than the opponent for almost the whole campaign. Parties, committees and large gifts, such as MK Pritzker's, came in too.
One platform, one risk
Fundraising ran through a single donation platform and through newsletters owned by private companies. A rule change or an outage hits everything at once.
The cost to the family
The response required her brother to talk in public about childhood abuse. That is a personal cost no method should treat as a resource.
Trust cuts both ways
The pandemic record brought admiration and also armed protests and attacks. It doesn't work where most people remember that role with anger.

Sources

Campaign releases and newsletters, reporting by AP, ABC News and the Ohio press, and finance filings as read by NBC4, Signal Ohio and the…

Campaign releases and newsletters, reporting by AP, ABC News and the Ohio press, and finance filings as read by NBC4, Signal Ohio and the Ohio Capital Journal. All pages were consulted on 4 November 2026.

23 sources

Who did it

Data

Press

Image: Patricio101, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons (adapted)

Updated 4 November 2026

Use this case

The text is Creative Commons BY 4.0: you can use, adapt and share it, in a class, an article or a training, as long as you credit the source.

Mendonça, V. (2026). Amy Acton, Ohio 2026: small donors and a same-day response. DIY for Change. https://janonismo.com/en/playbooks/acton-2026/ (updated 4 November 2026). CC BY 4.0.

Adapt this playbook with the assistant

Next playbook Stop the Ban Missouri

Related cases

Glossary: Rapid response, Small-dollar fundraising

Adapt to your country

The toolkits switch to the tools most used in that country (Telegram where it dominates, for example), its election rules and the state of its internet. It is a starting point, not a legal review. The choice is saved only in this browser.