DIYfor change
EN
Dome of the Kansas State Capitol in Topeka against a blue sky

Kansas, USA · 2022

Kansans for Constitutional Freedom

Keep government out

In the original: “free from government interference”, the core line of the Kansans for Constitutional Freedom message, according to The Nation (Sept. 2022).

On August 2, 2022, Kansas rejected the anti-abortion amendment 59% to 41% in a primary with record turnout. The No side brought together voters from every party.

Updated 27 October 202630 min readSources (32)

A tribute to Rachel Sweet, Ashley All, the coalition's organizations and the volunteers who knocked on doors in counties Trump carried. An independent project with no connection to the campaign.

Overview

In 30 seconds

  1. 59% No. On August 2, 2022, 557,837 Kansas voters rejected the amendment that would have removed abortion rights from the state constitution.

  2. 942,851 votes, double the 2018 primary, in a vote scheduled for August, when few people vote and most of them are party loyalists.

  3. The campaign talked about freedom and medical decisions without government interference, and treated unaffiliated voters and moderate Republicans like any other voter.

  4. Kansans for Constitutional Freedom supplied the message, literature and walk lists; local partners carried them to young people, Latinos and Republican voters.

  5. After Dobbs, canvassing volunteers went from about 50 to 500 a week, and the campaign raised $100,000 in a single day.

First steps

  1. Form the coalition under its own nonpartisan brand
  2. Run focus groups and surveys with voters outside your base
  3. Choose the shared value and write the message in one sentence

Try it now Adapt it with the assistant

If you're new to this, start with the fundamentals, from the vote goal to what the research says. Read the fundamentals

Context and story

The story

In 2021 the legislature's anti-abortion majority put the Value Them Both amendment on the August 2022 primary ballot.

In 2021 the legislature's anti-abortion majority put the Value Them Both amendment on the August 2022 primary ballot. In July a poll had Yes at 47% and No at 43%. Six weeks after Roe fell, about half of registered voters cast a ballot, and No won by 18 points.

59.16%
No: 557,837 votes to 385,014, official secretary of state totalsofficial Source
942,851
votes on the amendment, more than double the 2018 primary (457,598)official Source
70%
of new registrants after Dobbs were women, according to TargetSmartstudy Source
50 → 500
canvassing volunteers a week, before and after Dobbscampaign figure Source

From the court ruling to the vote

  1. 2019In Hodes & Nauser v. Schmidt, the Kansas Supreme Court rules 6-1 that the state constitution protects the right to end a pregnancy.
  2. Feb 7, 2020The first version of the amendment fails in the Kansas House: 80 votes to 43, four short of the required two-thirds.
  3. Jan 2021The amendment passes the House (86 to 38) and the Senate (28 to 11) and is set for the August 2, 2022 primary. The No coalition forms during 2021.
  4. May 2, 2022The draft Dobbs opinion leaks, signaling the end of Roe v. Wade.
  5. Jun 24, 2022Dobbs overturns Roe. KCF raises $100,000 that day, against $30,000 for all of June until then; voter registrations surge.
  6. Jul 12, 2022Registration deadline. Through KSVotes.org alone, nearly 12,000 people registered in 19 days, three times the same period in 2020.
  7. Jul 17–18, 2022co/efficient poll of 1,557 likely voters: 47% Yes, 43% No, 10% undecided.
  8. Aug 1, 2022Anonymous texts claim a Yes vote protects women's health. Once alerted, Twilio halts the sends; the firm that hired it had been paid by Do Right PAC, founded by former congressman Tim Huelskamp. The firm said it did not consult on the messages' content.
  9. Aug 2, 2022No wins with 59.16%, per the official totals certified in early September. In 103 of 105 counties, its margin beat Governor Laura Kelly's in her November reelection.
  10. Aug 4, 2026With 61.4% voting No, Kansans reject an amendment to elect state Supreme Court justices; opponents called it an attempt to change the result of 2022.

Three layers

KCF didn't do everything itself: it built the core and let partners and volunteers carry the same message to audiences it couldn't reach.

  • The coreKCF: campaign management, communications, data with voter scores, paid media made with GMMB and its own canvassing in five counties.
  • The coalitionPlanned Parenthood Great Plains Votes, ACLU of Kansas, Trust Women Foundation, Mainstream Coalition, Women for Kansas, Loud Light and others, each with its own audience and using KCF's materials and lists.
  • The spontaneous networkFirst-time volunteers, homemade signs, rallies called by people who had never organized anything and clergy who preached about the vote.
What isn't known. No data isolates the effect of the canvassing or the message: the Dobbs shock, the amendment's confusing wording and the unpopularity of a total ban all weighed at once, and Tom Bonier himself said new registrants alone would not decide it.

The vote total varies by source: on election night reports said more than 900,000, and Ballotpedia lists 922,321 votes (58.97% No); the secretary of state's official totals, published after a recount requested by opponents, show 942,851 votes and 59.16% No, which is what this playbook uses. The figures for doors, calls and texts come from a case study by NGP VAN, the software vendor, and are not audited. The campaign did not run on small donors: through August 17, KCF reported $11.47 million in contributions, with large checks from the Sixteen Thirty Fund ($1.585 million), the Planned Parenthood Action Fund ($1.16 million) and Stacy Schusterman ($1.1 million); no breakdown by donation size could be found. No internal campaign review has been published, and Rachel Sweet's 2023 piece could only be read in summary. A 2024 study (Amos and Middlewood) shows the vote drew more women, young people and first-time voters than a normal primary, but that these groups were more likely to skip the November election.

The terrain

What was specific to Kansas in 2022 and may be missing elsewhere.

What was specific to Kansas in 2022 and may be missing elsewhere.

Platforms

Doors, phones and texts
The core of direct contact: more than 76,000 doors, 930,000 calls and 150,000 texts, according to the case study by NGP VAN, the software vendor, using lists segmented by voter scores.
Paid TV
More than $6 million on TV, according to the spokesperson. The first ad talked about individual rights without saying abortion; later ones featured a doctor, a pastor, a Catholic grandmother and a mother.
Direct mail and digital ads
More than $463,000 on mail and $512,000 on digital, per a July ethics commission report. The sources do not describe the mailers; on TV, most ads said abortion, but not all.
Instagram and direct messages
Vote Neigh analyzed who interacted with its accounts and used comments and DMs to invite young people to rallies and the Ponies to the Polls weekend.
KSVotes.org
An independent voter registration site, not an official state service. On June 24, 2022, the day of Dobbs, it logged more registrations than on any non-deadline day in four years.
Yard signs, rallies and churches
Voters made their own signs, supportive clergy preached about the vote and a hand-lettered poster on an overpass warned that birth control was next.

Local conditions

  • A Republican state: Trump beat Biden 56.2% to 41.6% in 2020. Registered voters were 44% Republican, 26% Democratic and 29% unaffiliated.
  • The legislature put the measure on the August primary ballot, when 20% to 25% of voters usually turn out; the secretary of state predicted 36%.
  • Closed primaries: unaffiliated voters only got the amendment question, and they don't usually vote in August.
  • In 2019 the Kansas Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that the state constitution protects personal autonomy, including the decision to end a pregnancy. The amendment aimed to overturn that.
  • Dobbs came down on June 24, 2022, six weeks before the vote; neighboring Missouri and Oklahoma already had bans.
  • The amendment's wording was confusing, and the Yes side insisted it was not a ban.
  • Kansas law did not require texts about ballot questions to say who paid for them and, according to the ethics commission, allowed misleading election advertising.

Method and evidence

The method

The No campaign started from arithmetic: no single bloc could win the vote alone.

The No campaign started from arithmetic: no single bloc could win the vote alone. It had to add Democrats, unaffiliated voters and moderate Republicans with a message none of them felt was partisan, and explain a confusing ballot again and again.

Three fronts

Freedom without a party label
The message was personal autonomy and health decisions free from government interference, grounded in the 2019 ruling. The same for every audience: ads about rights that didn't say abortion, and others that did, voiced by trusted messengers.
Do the electoral math
Turnout modeled cautiously, unaffiliated voters treated like any other, moderate Republicans and Democrats on the same footing. Lists segmented by scores in the voter file.
A coalition with a shared kit
A core that supplied message, literature, walk lists and field infrastructure; partners that worked with their own audiences, including young people and Latinos in the southwest.

The campaign cycle

The cycle reconstructed from interviews and published figures. Where a source doesn't describe a step, the text flags it as the playbook's suggestion.

  1. Research Focus groups and surveys to find the frame that worked with conservatives, independents and progressives: constitutional rights and freedoms.
  2. Model turnout Plan for a small, conservative primary, not for polls that assumed high turnout. Hence the need to reach unaffiliated voters and Republicans.
  3. Fix the message One message, each person's right to make decisions about their body and health without the government in the way, told in different formats.
  4. Equip the coalition Literature, walk lists and field infrastructure for each partner, which organized in its own territory. In the southwest, the statewide script gave way to more open conversations.
  5. Talk Doors, phones and texts for the voter universes; casual conversations in the southwest; rallies and social media for young people.
  6. Explain the ballot Paid media, earned media, direct contact and mail to say what a Yes or a No vote means, including an ad just about the amendment's wording.
  7. Absorb the wave When Dobbs came down, channel the anger into canvassing shifts, donations and voter registration, keeping the same strategy.
  8. Get out the vote In the final stretch, remind people of the day, the place and what a No vote means. The playbook's suggestion: prepare a response to last-minute disinformation in advance, since it arrived on August 1.

And again.

Who did it

This playbook draws on what the campaign's leadership and coalition partners said and wrote: above all the interviews spokesperson Ashley…

This playbook draws on what the campaign's leadership and coalition partners said and wrote: above all the interviews spokesperson Ashley All and campaign manager Rachel Sweet gave during and after the vote, checked against official results and Kansas reporting.

  • Rachel Sweet

    Campaign manager, Kansans for Constitutional Freedom (KCF)

    Ran the No campaign, decided to talk to unaffiliated voters like any other voter and wrote about the win a year later.

    Sources
  • Ashley All

    Communications director and spokesperson, KCF

    Anchored the message in personal autonomy, explained the strategy in interviews and went on to work on winning reproductive rights campaigns in Kentucky, Montana, Michigan and Ohio.

    Sources
  • Loud Light and Vote Neigh

    Topeka youth voting group; Davis Hammet (president), Melissa Stiehler (advocacy) and Rija Nazir (Vote Neigh)

    Ran Vote Neigh, a hot-pink, western-themed youth campaign with the Ponies to the Polls weekend; Hammet publicly called out the misleading texts on the eve of the vote.

    Sources
  • New Frontier Project

    Loud Light project in southwest Kansas; Alejandro Rangel-Lopez

    Swapped KCF's statewide script, which didn't fit the southwest, for casual conversations that began by asking what the voter thought.

    Sources
  • Coalition partners

    Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes, ACLU of Kansas, Trust Women Foundation, Mainstream Coalition, Women for Kansas

    Each spoke to its own audience with the shared message, from a group fighting extremism inside the Republican Party to a nonpartisan public-education group.

    Sources
  • Local volunteers

    First-time organizers in conservative counties

    In Crawford County, a woman and her friends knocked on 1,600 doors in the final weeks and No won the county by 1,110 votes; in Topeka, Kurstin Gaudet helped lead a march of more than 500 people.

    Sources
  • GMMB

    KCF's political ad agency

    Made the TV ads featuring Kansans: a doctor, a pastor, a Catholic grandmother and a mother who had a lifesaving abortion.

    Sources

In their own words

Participants' statementsWhat the campaign's leaders and organizers said about the decisions they made.

What the campaign's leaders and organizers said about the decisions they made. Paraphrased unless otherwise noted.

  • “Voters do not see abortion as a partisan issue.” So the campaign talked with people across the political spectrum.

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Rolling Stone, interview on the lessons of Kansas, 2022

  • The team modeled a small, conservative primary electorate and was very cautious; she suspects pollsters assumed turnout based on past elections.

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Rolling Stone, 2022

  • KCF worked as a support structure: messaging, literature, walk lists and field infrastructure. The local partners did the organizing in their communities.

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Rolling Stone, 2022

  • In focus groups and surveys, protecting constitutional rights and freedoms worked best, including with progressive voters.

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Marketing Brew, Aug 16, 2022

6 more quotes
  • The experience went back to 2006: in the attorney general race against Phil Kline, the ad talked about medical privacy and never used the word abortion. Kline lost.

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Rolling Stone, 2022

  • On election night: “The deck was stacked against us from the beginning.” The vote had been put on an August primary.

    Rachel Sweet, campaign manager, Kansas Reflector, Aug 3, 2022

  • The campaign decided to communicate with unaffiliated voters exactly as it would with any other voter in the state.

    Rachel Sweet, campaign manager, CBS News, Aug 3, 2022

  • The amendment language was “incredibly confusing” and needed constant explaining. By the time the last-minute misleading texts arrived, voters already knew what each vote meant, so the texts “just made people angry.”

    Ashley All, KCF spokesperson, Rolling Stone, 2022

  • Knocked on about 600 doors. Her advice to Michigan: “walk and talk, walk and talk,” and don't bother with protesting.

    Mary Wehrman, KCF volunteer in Pittsburg, Kansas, Michigan Advance, Aug 7, 2022

  • New registrants from the last month would not decide the vote on their own, but he had never seen women make up 70% of them.

    Tom Bonier, TargetSmart (data analyst), CBS News, Aug 3, 2022

Materials and exercises

Moves to take with you

Pick the moves that fit your context and add them to your kit.

Pick the moves that fit your context and add them to your kit.

  1. A freedom message for the whole spectrum

    Anchor the campaign in a value the other side's voters already hold (in Kansas, health decisions free from government interference) and say the same thing to every audience. It was the frame that worked best in focus groups, including with progressives, and No took 59% in a state Trump won by 15 points.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    Works when the vote depends on voters outside your base and there is a shared value they already defend.
    Don't use when
    Fails if the message hides what is at stake: voters need to know what they are voting on, and your base needs to see itself in the campaign.
    1. Week −24 Run focus groups with voters outside your base
    2. Week −20 Test three frames and pick the one that works with every audience
    3. Week −18 Write the message in one sentence and the language rules on one page
    4. Week −14 Choose trusted messengers for each audience
    5. Week −10 Launch the first piece built on the shared value, with no party language
    6. Week −6 Check at the doors that the message lands; adjust the format, keep the content

    Team

    • Communications: sets the message and the language rules
    • Research: focus groups and frame testing
    • Messengers: doctors, clergy, grandparents, people with their own story

    What to measure: Undecided voters contacted who, in a second conversation at the door or by phone, say they will vote your way after hearing the message.

    Risks to watch: The message can sound vague or hide the issue: say clearly what the vote decides, use flesh-and-blood messengers and explain to your base why the tone is what it is.

  2. Do the electoral math

    Model pessimistic turnout and list the blocs you need to add up. In Kansas, with 44% Republicans and a low-turnout primary, the campaign went after Democrats, unaffiliated voters and moderate Republicans, and treated unaffiliated voters like any other voter.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    Works when your base can't win alone and there is public or lawful data to segment voters.
    Don't use when
    Fails with personal data used without a legal basis, or when the model becomes an excuse to ignore people research says are hard to reach.
    1. Week −26 Estimate likely turnout in a low scenario
    2. Week −24 Add up the votes you have and list the blocs you're missing
    3. Week −20 Build contact universes by bloc, within data protection law
    4. Week −16 Split the universes between the core and the coalition partners
    5. Week −10 Contact unaffiliated voters like any other voter, with the same care
    6. Week −5 Revise the universes using results from doors and phones
    7. Week −1 Focus the final stretch on supporters who might not vote

    Team

    • Data and targeting: models turnout and builds the universes
    • Campaign management: decides the priority blocs and the budget
    • Field: turns universes into lists and shifts

    What to measure: Contacts made per target bloc against the weekly goal, recorded on the contact sheet.

    Risks to watch: Political opinion data is sensitive: use only lawful sources, keep the minimum and don't segment by protected characteristics without a legal basis.

  3. A coalition with a shared kit

    A core that supplies message, literature, walk lists and field infrastructure; partners who speak to their own audiences in their own way. In Kansas, groups for young people, Latinos, Republicans against extremism and public-education advocates carried the same message to people KCF couldn't reach.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    Works when organizations with their own audiences already exist and the core can produce materials and lists quickly.
    Don't use when
    Fails if the core tries to control every partner or if each partner changes the central message.
    1. Week −30 Map organizations with audiences the core can't reach
    2. Week −24 Agree on a shared message and what each partner may adapt
    3. Week −16 Produce the kit: literature, scripts, walk lists by territory
    4. Week −14 Train the partners' coordinators in a short session
    5. Week −10 Reassign lists every week based on results
    6. Week −1 Back the partners' mobilization weekends

    Team

    • Coalition relations: delivers the kit and collects the results
    • Coordinator for each partner: organizes its own volunteers
    • Core field team: covers territories with no partner

    What to measure: Canvassing or phone shifts completed by partners using the core's lists, per week.

    Risks to watch: Partners with their own agendas can expose the coalition: agree in writing on message and funding rules and on who speaks for whom.

  4. Infrastructure ready for the wave

    Have donations, volunteering, registration and shifts ready before a shock brings in new people. In Kansas, after Dobbs, volunteers went from about 50 to 500 a week and the campaign raised $100,000 in a day.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    Works when a likely outside event could shift public attention before the vote.
    Don't use when
    Fails if it's set up on the day of the shock: without shifts, lists and training ready, the energy drains away into one-off rallies.
    1. Week −16 Prepare donation, volunteer and voter registration pages
    2. Week −12 Have canvassing lists and shifts ready for ten times as many people
    3. Week −12 Record a short training video for new volunteers
    4. Week −6 On the day of the shock, call people to a specific shift, beyond outrage
    5. Week −6 Call every new volunteer within 48 hours and book their first shift
    6. Week −3 Remind newcomers of the registration deadline

    Team

    • Volunteer team: welcomes, trains and books shifts
    • Fundraising: page ready and same-day thank-yous
    • Voter registration: deadlines and official links

    What to measure: New volunteers who complete their first shift within seven days of signing up.

    Risks to watch: Untrained newcomers may get the message wrong or put themselves at risk: short training before the first shift, always in pairs and with a named coordinator.

  5. Explain the ballot before the disinformation

    Say on every channel what a Yes and a No vote mean, well before the eve of the vote. In Kansas the wording was confusing and on August 1 anonymous texts said the opposite of the truth; according to the spokesperson, voters already knew what each vote meant, and the texts just made people angry.

    How to set it up, step by step
    Works when
    Works when the ballot question is technical, long or confusing and the other side can exploit the confusion.
    Don't use when
    Fails if it starts in the last week, or if you answer disinformation with anonymous messages of your own.
    1. Week −16 Write down in two sentences what each vote means
    2. Week −14 Put those sentences on every flyer, script and ad
    3. Week −8 Make one piece just to explain the ballot wording
    4. Week −8 Train volunteers to ask whether the voter knows what a No vote means
    5. Week −2 Set up monitoring of the opponent's texts and ads for the final stretch
    6. D-day week If disinformation appears, report it to the platform and repeat the explainer

    Team

    • Communications: writes the explainer and keeps repeating it
    • Monitoring: watches the opponent's texts and ads
    • Legal: files reports with the platform and the election authority

    What to measure: Voters contacted who can correctly say in conversation what a No vote means, as a share of those contacted.

    Risks to watch: Replying in the heat of the moment can spread the lie: correct it with the positive explanation, without repeating the false line, and always sign your messages.

Toolkit

What the No campaign built, laid out for you to copy.

What the No campaign built, laid out for you to copy. It works for referendums, consultations, ballot initiatives or any vote where you need voters outside your base.

Choose your country to see the equivalent tools and the legal points to check.

Operations

A small professional core, a broad coalition and lots of new people arriving all at once. The sources describe the division of labor well and the day-to-day rhythm poorly.

Minimum team

Campaign management
Sets the plan, the voter universes and the budget; answers for the strategy to the coalition. Here, Rachel Sweet.
Communications and spokesperson
Fixes the message, tests frames, deals with the press and explains the ballot. Here, Ashley All.
Data and targeting
Builds the universes from the voter file with scores (here, from New River Strategies) and generates the walk and call lists.
Field
Runs the campaign's own canvassing (KCF did direct field work in five counties) and the phone and text shifts.
Coalition relations
Delivers literature and lists to partners and keeps everyone on the same message without taking away their autonomy.
Paid media
TV, mail and digital with an agency (here, GMMB): rights and freedom first, then trusted messengers and the ballot explainer.
Partners for specific audiences
Young people (Vote Neigh), Latinos in the southwest (New Frontier Project), people fighting extremism in the Republican Party (Mainstream Coalition), public-education advocates (Women for Kansas).

Rhythm

  1. Every weekCanvassing shifts: about 50 volunteers a week before Dobbs and about 500 after, according to the spokesperson.
  2. Every week (the playbook's suggestion)A short call with coalition partners to review the week's message and reassign lists.
  3. On the day of the shockOn June 24 KCF raised $100,000 and voter registrations surged. The playbook's suggestion: have the donation, volunteer and registration pages ready beforehand.
  4. The weekend before the voteVote Neigh held Ponies to the Polls, with rallies, photo booths and crafts; in Topeka, more than 500 people marched around the Statehouse on July 30.
  5. Every night in the final stretch (the playbook's suggestion)Monitor the opponent's texts and ads and keep a short reply ready that restates what a No vote means.

The sources don't describe KCF's internal meetings. Items marked as the playbook's suggestion don't appear in the sources as campaign practice; they are a recommendation for anyone replicating it.

Plan B

  • Printed walk lists for each partner, so nothing depends on an app or a signal in rural areas.
  • More than one channel for the same voter: door, phone, text and mail.
  • Autonomous partners: if the core falls behind, each group carries on with the materials it already has.
  • The ballot explainer repeated on every channel, so last-minute disinformation meets voters who already understand.
  • Donation, volunteer and registration pages ready before the shock.

Technology

Standard US campaign tools. What mattered was how the universes were segmented and using one system to send each volunteer to doors, calls and texts.

  • Voter file and CRM (SmartVAN)Paid (per-campaign license)

    Voter file with segmented audiences, the source of the walk, call and text lists.

  • Voter scores (New River Strategies)Paid (consulting)

    Proprietary models used to build the contact universes.

  • Canvassing with walk listsMore than $285,000 on canvassing

    More than 76,000 doors knocked by the campaign; partners received lists and literature for their territory.

  • Phones and textsCost per call and per message

    More than 930,000 calls and 150,000 texts to the voter universes, according to the vendor's case study.

  • TV, mail and digital adsThe largest budget line

    More than $6 million on TV, more than $463,000 on mail and more than $512,000 on digital.

  • Online donationsPlatform fees

    A donation page able to handle the spike: $100,000 on the day of Dobbs.

  • Voter registration site (KSVotes.org)Free for voters

    Independent, unofficial and outside the campaign; it registered nearly 12,000 people in the 19 days before the deadline.

  • Social media and DMs (Vote Neigh)Free

    Instagram, comments and direct messages to invite young people to rallies and the mobilization weekend.

Channel cheat sheets

Contact sheet columns

Date · Partner and territory · Channel (door, phone, text) · Contacts attempted · Contacts made · Supports No · Undecided · Supports Yes · Knows what a No vote means? (yes/no) · Main question heard · Vote plan made

Through August 17, 2022, KCF reported $11.47 million in contributions and $7.76 million in expenditures; the Value Them Both committee, $8.0 million and $7.39 million. With the other groups, the two sides took in close to $22 million in contributions. Within KCF, canvassing (more than $285,000) cost a fraction of TV (more than $6 million), and most of the budget went to paid media.

Communications

The message asked voters to agree with something they already believed: the government should not make decisions in place of a woman and her doctor. Nobody had to change their mind about abortion.

The message formula

  1. Start from a value the other side holds Freedom, less government, medical privacy. One TV ad paired the words “government mandate” with a photo of a sign asking customers to wear masks.
  2. Separate personal belief from the law Show that you can hold your own view on abortion and still protect another person's right to decide.
  3. Show the consequence The amendment opened the way to a ban without guaranteed exceptions for rape, incest or the mother's life. Point to neighboring states that had already banned it.
  4. Put trusted messengers forward A doctor, a pastor, a Catholic grandmother, a mother who had a lifesaving abortion.
  5. Explain the ballot What the amendment says, what a Yes vote means, what a No vote means. Repeat it until the day before.
  6. Ask for the vote and a plan Date, place and No. Remind unaffiliated voters that they can vote on the amendment alone.

Message rules

  • One message for every audience; only the format and the messenger change.
  • No party language: no party colors, no party leaders up front.
  • Talk about freedom and private medical decisions; say abortion when the messenger has the credibility to say it.
  • Don't attack people who have doubts about abortion: invite them to separate personal belief from the law.
  • Explain the ballot on every channel, right up to the day before.
  • Use the other side's facts: the lack of exceptions and the bans in neighboring states.
  • Always say who paid for each piece, even if the law doesn't require it.

Sample conversation (illustrative)

Good afternoon, I'm John, I live here in the county and I'm volunteering for No on the amendment on the 2nd. Can I ask what you think of it? [listen] I understand, a lot of people here have strong convictions about abortion, and I respect that. The ballot question is a different one: whether the government can make the decision in place of a woman and her doctor, even in cases of rape or when her life is at risk. A No vote keeps things as they are today. A Yes vote lets the legislature ban it. Do you know where you'll be voting on the 2nd?

Take it to your context

What works anywhere and what depended on Kansas in 2022.

What works anywhere and what depended on Kansas in 2022.

Works anywhere

  • Do the electoral math: which blocs you need to add up and which of them are not your base.
  • Find the value the other side's voters already hold and anchor the message in it.
  • One message for everyone, with different messengers for each audience.
  • Model turnout pessimistically and plan for that scenario.
  • A core that supplies the coalition with materials and lists, and partners free to work their own audiences.
  • Explain the ballot or the question as many times as it takes.
  • Have infrastructure ready for the day of the shock: donations, volunteering and registration.

Depends on context

A vote scheduled for a low-turnout primary
Where the date favors the other side, the job is to bring out people who don't usually vote that day. Where the vote coincides with a general election, the challenge becomes persuading people who will vote anyway.
Protecting an existing right (voting No)
Defending what exists tends to be easier than creating a new right. Michigan (2022, by almost 14 points) and Ohio (2023, 56.78%) added the right to their constitutions; in Ohio, the Yes campaign argued for limited government and patient-doctor privacy, and its main committee raised $42.5 million.
Simple majority
With a supermajority requirement the math changes: in Florida in 2024, abortion rights got about 57% and failed because 60% was needed. Plan for the threshold the law sets.
The libertarian streak of Kansas voters
Freedom and less government worked in a conservative state. In another country the shared value may be public health, dignity, family or secularism: only research will tell.
Voter files and party registration
In the US you can tell who is a registered Republican, Democrat or unaffiliated. Where that data doesn't exist (as in Portugal or Brazil), segment by territory, age and public voting history, always within data protection law.
Mass text messaging
Texting worked with lawful lists in the US. In the EU and Brazil, political messages go only to people who opted in; use WhatsApp or SMS with prior sign-up.
Misleading advertising allowed
In Kansas, the law didn't ban unsigned misleading texts. Where rules are stricter, report them to the election authority; where they aren't, the defense is to have explained first.

Practice

ExerciseRehearse with the case's missions and situations.

Decide as the leadership

Six moments from the 2022 campaign. Choose what you would do and see what happened.

5-phase plan

The No campaign's sequence, from a year out to the day itself, as a checklist.

The No campaign's sequence, from a year out to the day itself, as a checklist. Your progress is saved in this browser.

  1. A year out

  2. Build the machine (6 to 3 months out)

  3. Persuade (3 months to 6 weeks out)

  4. Final stretch (6 weeks out)

  5. Election day and after

Check yourself

ExerciseFive questions, each explained after you answer.

Five questions, each explained after you answer.

1. What was the core message of Kansans for Constitutional Freedom?
2. Why did the campaign need unaffiliated voters and moderate Republicans?
3. How did KCF work with its coalition partners?
4. What does the turnout analysis say about who voted?
5. On the eve of the vote, anonymous texts claimed a Yes vote protected women's health. What limited the damage?

Limits and sources

Rules

The rules below protect the campaign's credibility with voters outside its base.

The rules below protect the campaign's credibility with voters outside its base.

Sign everything
Say who paid for every ad, text and flyer, even where the law doesn't require it. In Kansas, the lack of a signature left the eve-of-vote texts with no visible author.
No misleading messages
Never imitate the other side's language to confuse people. Answer disinformation with the positive explanation.
Messages only with a legal basis
Texts and calls follow local law: in the US, FCC rules; in the EU and Brazil, political messages only to people who consented, with an easy way off the list.
Opinion data is sensitive
Political opinions and health data are special-category data under the GDPR and Brazil's LGPD. Keep the minimum, aggregated wherever possible.
Transparent donations
Report every contribution and check where it comes from. In April 2025 Kansas passed HB 2106, which bans foreign money in amendment campaigns; KCF challenged it in federal court in May.
Labeled advertising
In the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2024/900 requires a sponsor label and a transparency notice on every paid political ad. See the “Law and platforms in the European Union” sheet in the Fundamentals.
Respect at the door
People who say Yes get a thank-you. The message asks voters to separate personal belief from the law, without judging them.
Safety for volunteers and patients
Canvass in pairs, have a protocol for hostility and never expose patients or clinic staff without consent.

Limits

What this method doesn't do, and when it fails.
It doesn't prove cause
Dobbs, the confusing wording and the unpopularity of a total ban all weighed at once. No data isolates the effect of the canvassing or the message.
You can't manufacture a shock
Part of the 2022 wave came from Dobbs, six weeks earlier. The method gets a campaign ready for a shock without depending on one.
One-day mobilization doesn't become a habit
Women, young people and first-time voters drawn in by the vote were more likely to skip the November 2022 election, according to Amos and Middlewood (2024).
Winning the vote doesn't end the fight
The legislature kept its anti-abortion majority; in 2025 it passed the ban on foreign money in amendment campaigns; in 2026 it put direct election of Supreme Court justices on the ballot, and 61.4% voted No. In November 2026, Missouri votes on repealing the reproductive rights amendment it passed in 2024.
The frame isn't magic
Between 2022 and 2024 the rights side won most of these votes, but in 2024 it lost in South Dakota and Nebraska and fell short of the 60% required in Florida (about 57%).
It wasn't a cheap campaign
KCF reported $11.47 million in contributions, with large national donors; canvassing was cheap, TV at scale was not.
Neutrality has a cost
The name Constitutional Freedom was vague enough that some voters didn't know which side the campaign was on; a message without the word abortion needs other voices so the issue doesn't disappear.

Sources

This playbook was built from interviews with the campaign's leadership and coalition partners, the Kansas secretary of state's official…

This playbook was built from interviews with the campaign's leadership and coalition partners, the Kansas secretary of state's official results, finance data, turnout analyses and reporting published between August 2022 and August 2026. All pages were accessed on October 27, 2026.

32 sources

Who did it

Data

Press

Analysis

Image: w_lemay, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons (adapted)

Updated 27 October 2026

Next playbook The green wave

Adapt to your country

The toolkits switch to the tools most used in that country (Telegram where it dominates, for example), its election rules and the state of its internet. It is a starting point, not a legal review. The choice is saved only in this browser.